61)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Unable to upload 2 zip files
(Message 37189)
Posted 12 Jun 2009 by Helmer Bryd Post:
OK, Oxford has their priorities, well, I have a lot of results to upload and going on a vacation now so I guess most of them will be lost, well well |
62)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why this forum, if the project team doesn\'t bother to go here?
(Message 27261)
Posted 10 Mar 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: bull |
63)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why this forum, if the project team doesn\'t bother to go here?
(Message 27260)
Posted 10 Mar 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: The BBC forum had to be set up separately because the BBC insisted on having it. At some point it will be closed down, I\'d guess before the end of 2007. Then we\'ll be left with two main forums - this one and the php. |
64)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Status of plans for shorter wus?
(Message 27037)
Posted 23 Feb 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: mo.v No, I wasn\'t referring to the April flaw but the switch on a sulphur parameter in the 5.15 models compared to the 5.08 models that shows different output Carl said some half year ago that implementing 40-year models would take about 2 weeks of full time work to do I guess, and I guess this would be the same kind of software that can restore all the crashed models? The 160 year model was just one option when the coupled model was ironed out I think that was a mistake A normal human beeing wants to finish a given task :) |
65)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Status of plans for shorter wus?
(Message 27023)
Posted 23 Feb 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: Hm, I see a lot of posts have been deleted from this thread, including mine. Another observation is that the moderators Les and mo.v are not running the project themselves, how can you answer peoples questions if you are not in the \"dirt\" yourself? If the admins don\'t have the time to look into this forum then why not shut it down? |
66)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINC Version 5.8.8 Released
(Message 26945)
Posted 20 Feb 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: Ahh..*smacks the head* It was in the UNIX part I posted Sorry mo.v :( |
67)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINC Version 5.8.8 Released
(Message 26934)
Posted 20 Feb 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: So moderator mo.v has deleted posts again? To polish up a thread? I have got enough and do not run this project anymore |
68)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
New BOINC Version 5.8.8 Released
(Message 26534)
Posted 3 Feb 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: Hey Carl, the Linux version is not yet rated as stable. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php |
69)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
First phase of migration of BBC/CCE to cpdn and standard version of boinc
(Message 26251)
Posted 21 Jan 2007 by Helmer Bryd Post: Hm, seems I lost 110,000 points or so, was that the Spinup? |
70)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
20,000,000,000 Credits across ALL BOINC Projects
(Message 25627)
Posted 16 Dec 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: You need to get a new moderator Guess this will be deleted too |
71)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
20,000,000,000 Credits across ALL BOINC Projects
(Message 25624)
Posted 16 Dec 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: So my earlier post was moderated out, what was wrong in that post? You need to know that the Boinc credit system have been highly inflated by optimised clients depending on the benchmarking system. Climate never had this problem thanks to Carl. |
72)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
20,000,000,000 Credits across ALL BOINC Projects
(Message 25619)
Posted 15 Dec 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: Who cares |
73)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Core 2 Duo E6600 speed
(Message 25533)
Posted 9 Dec 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: Might to add: One model + 1 Einstein task shows 1.26 s/TS, so no slowdown there. |
74)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Core 2 Duo E6600 speed
(Message 25530)
Posted 9 Dec 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: These 1.10-1.30 speeds people report are overclocked machines, and the beauty about this chip is that they are rather easy to overclock. Mine E6600 @3.2 GHz is doing 1.32-1.35 with two models and the Linux client (which is a couple of % slower than Windows) With one model it\'s around 1.25. With one model + a GIMPS M32 LL test it\'s around 1.45, hmm... |
75)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Linux performance
(Message 25385)
Posted 30 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: Linux is better in handling memory and disks. I had no problem when running SAP that uses 430 mb memory on a box with 512 mb memory installed. No defrag required either |
76)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Linux Newbie Question: Best distribution for CPDN
(Message 25263)
Posted 24 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: It seems like Debian Sarge doesn\'t work. I have tried Red Hat 8.0, Fedora C2-3-4, Zenwalk and they work well. |
77)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
error: meaning ?
(Message 25261)
Posted 24 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: Thanks Jim. Yeah, the files had already been used the first time and couldn\'t be found the second time after restarting. This happened to me too but the model just happily chugged along :) |
78)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Naughty Intel patch - has anybody tried it?
(Message 25258)
Posted 24 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: The coupled model is compiled with Intel Fortran 9 and there are no SSE optimisations anymore since they were not stable. To check the speed you can take the time between the checkpoints in minutes*0.139, that gives the current s/TS. Intel is a little bit faster now but not more than 3-5% according to Geophi. |
79)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
computation error - cannot open input file dataout/atmos_restart.day
(Message 24983)
Posted 3 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: This is a bit sad, I was thinking of moving to Slackware, a bit tired of Fedora. Well they have a 2.6.x kernel in /extra, could you try that? |
80)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
computation error - cannot open input file dataout/atmos_restart.day
(Message 24972)
Posted 2 Nov 2006 by Helmer Bryd Post: Does it work well with other (heavy) things? It could be a memory problem since CPDN is very memory intensive. First thing I would do is to up the voltage a bit on the memory sticks. Test it with Memtest86+ |
©2024 climateprediction.net