climateprediction.net home page
Posts by old_user59948

Posts by old_user59948

41) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14496)
Posted 18 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Its my WU so I will try.
I am using BOIC VIEW. I have copied the screen into a word pad file so if some one gives me an email addy I will send it.

EDIT:
OK I put it on my web site:

www.iantighe.com/boincView.htm

END EDIT:

The % completed column was set back to zero at start of phase 3. Not culmulative.

The CPU time used up to the point of phase 3 commencement was 15 days or so cannot remember exactly ....so this is culmulative.

The projected completion date starts with the huge number as phase 3 commences - that is in the title of this thread.....is now 79 days etc etc.

If this is what you want then send email address and i'll send the screen dump....unless its OK to post it here?....too big!

Cheers
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
42) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14493)
Posted 18 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
By way of an update the WU in phase 3 is now at 9.07 s/TS with a projected finsih in 81 days. It slowly looks more attractive.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
43) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14471)
Posted 17 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Hmmmm. May be.

Its about projected finish times when new phases start. Like they start really big and then get smaller. Equally the secs per time step start big and grdually get more realistic. But as this was my first model I was not sure what was happening. If that's of interest pls help ur self.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
44) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14466)
Posted 17 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
No I am not aware of that....would be nice though.

On my problem though the secs/TS has reduced massively now over 36 hours or so. Now at 13.39 s/TS and model projected completion is 120 days - down from 155000. It still seems to be falling slowly.....

I say this here now just to let folk know there advice was good and so that others that might come along later with the same question have the benefit of the whole story as it were. Saves them asking in a panic like I did perhaps.

Again thanks to all you folks for helping me.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
45) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14436)
Posted 16 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
&gt; OK it has trickled now so it is getting CPU time. As others have said ingor
&gt; the time to completion.
&gt;
&gt; Or work it out yourself as (100 - percent done) * 2592.48 * sec/TS (2.45 in
&gt; this case) /60 /60 = CPU hours to completion of phase.
&gt;
&gt; (This formula is only for linux users where the percent done is of the phase
&gt; not the whole model.)
&gt;
&gt; Edit: That may well be too optimistic, it appears the models may have switched
&gt; processors so you may need to use 3.2 rather than 2.45.
&gt; _______________________________
&gt; Visit <a> href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page"&gt;BOINC
&gt; WIKI</a> for help
&gt;
&gt; And join <a href="http://www.boincsynergy.com/">BOINC Synergy</a> for all the
&gt; news in one place.
&gt;

Ok thanks I will do that. Again thanks for your help and insights to this.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
46) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14432)
Posted 16 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
&gt; Hmmm. Has your computer got HT enabled? I am trying to work out why 9 of 10
&gt; last trickles (over 6 days) for that host were result 918683 then a switch to
&gt; 918761.
&gt; _______________________________
&gt; Visit <a> href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page"&gt;BOINC
&gt; WIKI</a> for help
&gt;
&gt; And join <a href="http://www.boincsynergy.com/">BOINC Synergy</a> for all the
&gt; news in one place.
&gt;

Yes 3.0 HT enabled and runs fine. Of the two models there one always gets lots of CPU and the other very little. I did wonder if there was CPU affinity; Anyway I got one model in phase 1 and the other in phase 3. This is a similar story to another box i have with win 2003 server. It too has one model well in advance of the other.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
47) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14416)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
&gt; &gt; I do have restart.end1 and .end2 files in datain though. Presumeably
&gt; that
&gt; &gt; gives a clue to the phase?
&gt;
&gt; Not necessarily. They could be left over from before the glitch. You can
&gt; check what the last files written to are in the
&gt;
&gt; BOINCfoldername/projects/climateprediction.net/experimentname/dataout
&gt; directory
&gt;
&gt; If some of the most recent files (by timestamp associated with the last write
&gt; to the file) have a p1 or p2 preceding c10 in the filenames, then you are in
&gt; the 3rd phase. If they have 11 or 12 preceding c10, you are in the 1st
&gt; phase.
&gt;
&gt; Edit...looks like Thyme gave you an easier way to check.
&gt;

ah so I have the latest file as 074dca.php1c10. Hmmmmmm...i guess I am phase 3

Thanks all for your help much appreciated!
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
48) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14412)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Ah. Well they say
3
5329
So that means I am in phase 3 then yes?
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
49) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14410)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
I do have restart.end1 and .end2 files in datain though. Presumeably that gives a clue to the phase?
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
50) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14405)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Ah thanks. I do not have a visual means of seeing whats happening. The number of days has a reduced a little further but not much. I guess I hang on a while and see.....but will dump it if necessary. Shame though if I do have to do that after nearly 15 days of CPU time. Thanks for coming back to me though.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
51) Message boards : Number crunching : 155,553 days to completion.....advice needed please? (Message 14402)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Hi
Hmmmm.....I started phase 3 I think of my first model and boincview projected that huge number of 155,553 days to completion. P3 Linux 3.0 HT. After an hour or so this has reduced to 1967 days but seems to be stuck about there at 228 s/TS. Of course a missed deadline is being notified to me. What do I do if it does not reduce to something within timescale? Shame to dump it but equally if it will not be accepted why waste more CPU time on it? Advice please?

On this basis my little ole laptop running another model will finish just after the earth ends I think.

Thanks.
52) Message boards : Number crunching : Client Error (Message 14397)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
I have had the -5 error on 2 of my PCs. Just can't run cpdn on them but other PCs are fine. I just accept there is something awry but cannot detect it for now. The other PCs do run seti and lhc just fine btw. Whilst this does not help you track it down it is first hand current info to reassure you that you are not alone.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
53) Message boards : Number crunching : Point to the Wiki (Message 14388)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
for everyone's signature ...


Meaning?
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
54) Message boards : Number crunching : Point to the Wiki (Message 14384)
Posted 15 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
&gt; The link work in my signature, I don't know why it is messed up and too
&gt; depressed to try to figure it out today ...
&gt; <p>
&gt; <a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php"><b>BOINC-Wiki</b></a>
&gt; <img> src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=a6477942e70ed39f669d1ff2ede05be8"&gt;
&gt;

Hmmmm. OK well glad I helped a little perhaps.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
55) Message boards : Cafe CPDN : Why slow down Fossil Fuel consumption? (Message 14357)
Posted 14 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
I think any plan to burn up fossil fuels early will cause problems. There is no replacement fuel source as yet. Energy is costed on the basis of its rivals so gas prices generally follow oil prices etc. Large rises in demand will cause price increases and it will be the most vulnerable that will suffer....not the V8 driver. Eventually China would make war on us to get hold of whatever energy sources remained and mankind would be doomed....as it already is.....as a result. My solution would be to place a 25% tax on all fossil fuel consumption on a hypothicated basis and see that go into world wide scientific search for new fuels that will sustain the human race for the next 1000 years. It must be government based of course to avoid commercial rip-offs. I hate to say it but nuclear power is perhaps an option here and we must not ignore it. That hurts a bit to say that but we would be foolish to ignore it. France generates something like 90% of its electricity that way which must be benficial to the environment. Contentious as usual..........that's me.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
56) Message boards : Number crunching : Point to the Wiki (Message 14356)
Posted 14 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
&gt; My provisioner broke all my scripts again. Since all but a few pages have been
&gt; migrated to the Wiki, well, I am killing the old site to concentrate on the
&gt; Wiki for now.
&gt;
&gt; Update your bookmarks and signatures to point only to the Wiki.
&gt;
&gt; Thanks!
&gt; <p>
&gt; <a>BOINC Documentation</a>
&gt; <a><b>BOINC-Wiki</b></a>
&gt; <img>
&gt;

@Paul......link here would be good


Edit: A helping hand:

<a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php">Go See Wiki Here</a>

<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
57) Message boards : Number crunching : multiple towers (Message 14236)
Posted 9 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
If you were doing this I would run Linux on the box as it gets through CPDN much much faster than Windows in my experience.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
58) Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC version downloads updated (Message 14235)
Posted 9 Jul 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Think I'll stick with my home compiled 4.32 for now on Linux and 4.27 on Windows for now.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
59) Message boards : Number crunching : Main forum down? (Message 13845)
Posted 25 Jun 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Yeah truely great storm here in NE Hants ... from 14:00 onwards. Power to my PCs went twice.....need to think about a UPS perhaps.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">
60) Message boards : Number crunching : Linux vs. Windows crunching speed (Message 13814)
Posted 24 Jun 2005 by Profile old_user59948
Post:
Ah Ok thanks for the information there. My linux box has now moved onto phase 2 of its model as far as I can tell. Interestingly its doing 49.06 s/TS.....and needs 442 days to complete.......so....I wont trust these numbers perhaps! I use boincview btw so perhaps its not quite accurate either. Thx again.
<img src="http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-1091.jpg"></img><br><img src="http://www.iantighe.com/setisig.jpg"></img><img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/teamStats.php?userID=1602&amp;prj=1&amp;trans=off">


Previous 20 · Next 20

©2024 climateprediction.net