climateprediction.net home page
Posts by JIM

Posts by JIM

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62541)
Posted 7 hours ago by Profile JIM
Post:
All mine have uploaded.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62523)
Posted 2 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
I now have about 50 zip files that I can’t upload. I am suspending the 8 CP Wu’s running on my 2 machines until they get the server problem sorted out. Back to Rosetta and WCG.
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62514)
Posted 3 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
The server down at the bottom of the planet is being attacked by thousands of Windows computers, and is getting a bit battered and bruised.
It may take some time to recovery, so Patience.

Ommmmmm ...


it might be a good idea if everyone reading this was to suspend uploads for a day or so, so as to take some of the pressure off the server while it gets caught up. Nothing will be lost.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62506)
Posted 3 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
The year long deadline may be partly historical. Back when this project started the slow computers (1.2 GHz) single core machines took 8 or 9 months (running 24/7) to complete the very long 160 year models. They needed the long deadlines. Now, not so much.
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62501)
Posted 4 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
[quote]The "BOINC deadline" is long to prevent cpdn from hogging the processors, when other very much shorter projects are run at the same time.
This has been posted about for years.

A shorter deadline, something on the order of 4 to 5 months, would seem to be in order as that seems to be how long the Researchers are willing to wait before they close the batches. There is no sense in running models that no one is ever going to look at because the batch was closed by the time you finished it.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading files fails (Message 62496)
Posted 4 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
I am uploading two zips now. They are a bit slow at 50 kbps, but at least going.


Did they ever finish uploading and clear? Many of mine have reached 100% only to stall there and then drop back to 0%.
7) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 62464)
Posted 7 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
[
I assume that they are being done on laptops, which is the wrong place to do them I believe.

Better a reasonable time limit of 60 days (or 30 is OK with me).


I STRONGLY DISAGREE! I have been running CPDN (almost exclusively) for more than 10 years, since the days of the BBC experiment. I have over 20,000,000 credits. All of this work has been run exclusively on laptops.
8) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 62450)
Posted 8 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
I see what you mean. I just checked my RAC and after about 4 months of no work for Windows my RAC is down to 6.3. I hope they fix this before all the Windows people lose the right to post on this site.
9) Message boards : Number crunching : "No tasks sent" (Message 62418)
Posted 19 days ago by Profile JIM
Post:
There are no Windows tasks (wah2) at the moment, and none on the horizon that anyone knows about.


Though as I posted a few days ago,

#869 Micro-batch of 15 pnw tasks went out on the 29th April.


Sometimes these micro-batches are the herald of a larger release though I have seen nothing on the moderator communications to suggest this on this occasion. Three of the fifteen have completed. The other twelve have all gone to a machine with an average turn around time of 65 days so even if it is the herald of a larger batch we may have to wait a while.


There should be some way to better spread these small test batches (if that’s what this micro-batch was) around so that they don’t all get sucked into this kind of black hole machine. Otherwise this will become more and more of a problem as processors get ever larger numbers of cores.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : "No tasks sent" (Message 62322)
Posted 20 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
[quote]"Project requested delay of 3636 seconds" repeatedly.

FYI the 3636 second is the standard 1 hour back-off
11) Message boards : Number crunching : What is "HadAM4 at N216 resolution v8.52"? (Message 62321)
Posted 20 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
This is apparently the current work unit, and the last one I ran, but don't see a description for it.
But before taking resources off of coronavirus, I am wondering what it is?
The files include "ozone" and "solar", so it could be important in those areas.


HadAM4 at N216 resolution v8.52 is the new Linux only model. From what I’ve read it requires a lot of RAM (about 4GB per core) to run well.
12) Message boards : Cafe CPDN : Status page. (Message 62305)
Posted 14 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
And someone has returned a WAH2RI task" How long is it since any of them were sent out???

Looking at tasks for my longest continually running PC, finally retired last fall, the last batches issued for RI might have been Oct 2016. So 3.5 years ago.


Even my atom powered netbook would have completed those tasks in under six months!


Most likely someone reactivated a very old computer that had been sitting in storage for a few years. I supposed it would be possible to pull up the trickles and see if there is a 3+ year gap between 2 of them.
13) Message boards : Cafe CPDN : Status page. (Message 62301)
Posted 13 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
Just done my daily check of the status page. Number of users in last 24 hours shows Linux only three behind the windows tasks despite the, "number of tasks in progress" for Windows being about seven times as many as for Linux. I am guessing it must mean a lot of those windows tasks are never going to be returned.


I’ve known that for years. Most of those “in progress” tasks have been lost in ways that the server never found out about and will never be completed. With no significant new work for Windows in months just about everyone with running Windows tasks has finished them.
14) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 62286)
Posted 8 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
THE PROJECT SEEMS TO HAVE GIVEN UP ON WINDOWS!
15) Questions and Answers : Getting started : No work units? (Message 62281)
Posted 5 Apr 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
Sometimes but by no means always, tasks in testing herald batches on the main site.


That assumes that the testing goes well.
16) Message boards : Cafe CPDN : Australia's bush fires (Message 62096)
Posted 9 Feb 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
It’s like you lived in Southern California were brushfire season is followed by rain and mudslide season.
17) Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : HadAM4 at N216 resolution (Message 62037)
Posted 25 Jan 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
While we wait for the researcher to get access, (or the working week), the following has shown up on an Aus news site:

Darwin River Dam at lowest level since 2006, but NT Government quiet on action

The relevant part:

Mr Durling said Power and Water was planning its future using long-term "climate change information provided by the Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO".

"We look at horizons including 2030, 2065 and 2090 to incorporate those planned changes," he said.


I assume that this Darwin River and it’s dam are in Australia.
18) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 62024)
Posted 24 Jan 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
Will likely be gone fast.

They seem to have disappeared before you could speak the words.
Linux, on the other hand, is hopeless. There used to be people around here who could run them.
Gone with the Wind.


Its starting to look like the researchers have overreached what the average home computer can handle. There don’t seem to be that many home boxes that are running Linux and can meet the huge memory and L2 requirement out there as they expected. So they Linux work sits and sits. Meantime for Windows users the cupboard is usually bare. Keep this up and they could kill this project.
19) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 61979)
Posted 15 Jan 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
Hopefully just a test batch for something larger to come.
20) Message boards : Number crunching : New work Discussion (Message 61975)
Posted 15 Jan 2020 by Profile JIM
Post:
There are two new Windows batches in testing which may well lead to some main site work once they are finished.


Did these 2 batches of Windows work ever appear or are they still in testing.


Next 20

©2020 climateprediction.net