Posts by transient

41) Message boards : Number crunching : HadCM3 160-year runtime estimate wrong? (Message 32095) Posted 9 Jan 2008 by transient Post: I\'ve just downloaded two new HadCM3 models. I got 160-year models (7177229, 7177246), replacing 80-year models which have just finished on both machines. Yet both machines are telling me that the models will take about 48 days, the same as the 80-year models: that estimate is about right for 80 years at 2.0/2.1 s/TS, but it should be 96 days for 160 years. BOINC is v5.10.13 under Windows XP. I also got a 160 year model, and it also displays about the same time to complete as the 80 years models, I crunched previously. The deadline is sufficiently far away, so it is not much of a problem to the BOINC manager, I think. Yes,I do know deadlines don\'t matter on CPDN, but the manager doesn\'t know that. ;)
42) Message boards : Number crunching : Where did I go wrong (Message 25995) Posted 13 Jan 2007 by transient Post: I hope so, it is a good many hours of computing. It would be a shame if it had been a waste of time. As for a backup, I\'ve made some but the last one is almost a month back (I blame the holidays <g>)
43) Message boards : Number crunching : Where did I go wrong (Message 25982) Posted 13 Jan 2007 by transient Post: http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=5618592 This model crashed on me right before the end. Where did I go wrong? EDIT: This was the error message relating to this model I guess 1/12/2007 2:26:37 PM\|climateprediction.net\|Unrecoverable error for result hadcm3lbm_amo1_25265204_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>hadcm3lbm_amo1_25265204_0_16.zip</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code></file_xfer_error>)

Previous 20