Message boards :
Number crunching :
New work discussion - 2
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 . . . 42 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Mine all say nz25. All my EAS tasks broke due to computer restarts or crashing in the first 10 seconds. The NZ are much faster, either due to being smaller, or because I (happened to by luck?) get only two on each of 7 machines. Hopefully being faster means I can finish some before one breaks due to an unauthorized Windows update reboot which I keep disabling in different ways and M$ keep finding a way around. Somebody really needs to sue them over that gross stupidity.Looks like all the WAHs are now running smoothly.I currently have 19 EAS uploads of around 118MB each queued waiting for upload7 to start working again. At least my NZ uploads are working. My Linux virtualboxes await the other variety, when are they coming? |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
My Linux virtualboxes await the other variety, when are they coming?Autumn was what Glen said many posts ago. |
Send message Joined: 29 Oct 17 Posts: 1044 Credit: 16,200,454 RAC: 10,973 |
Update on EAS25 batch upload issues The OS upgrade on the Korean server has been finished. Some of the OS packages required by the boinc software were outdated and suspected of causing problems, hence the upgrade. The upload7 server is not running yet, it needs more work on the boinc side before uploads can be turned back on. Might be 2 weeks before this happens - please don't delete the tasks if possible. --- CPDN Visiting Scientist |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
Thanks Glen. Storage isn't a problem for me but I will prioritise the other tasks. As well as two for the smaller region I got another three of the ten year ones from testing. I have suspended these till the rest are finished. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jul 17 Posts: 99 Credit: 18,701,746 RAC: 318 |
Weather & climate models are very non-linear. Small differences in numerical calculations can quickly cause big differences in runs of identical code on different hardware (many, many, years ago this was a topic of my PhD). There are places in the code where just a single bit difference is enough. For example, for a cloud to form the air must be saturated, so the code computes the saturation at each grid-point and compares it to the value needed for a cloud to form. A single bit difference in that comparison is all you need to have, or, not have a cloud form. A cloud makes significant changes to its local environment.Glenn, I wonder if running climate simulations on the DynexSolve distributed neuromorphic computing network might be faster and/or more accurate. It's still a work in progress and they might welcome the extra load. Their devs are active on their Discord channel. https://dynexcoin.org/about |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
Glenn, I wonder if running climate simulations on the DynexSolve distributed neuromorphic computing network might be faster and/or more accurateIt might be if the project had more than just Andy for IT support. Also the project doesn't have anyone with GPU programming experience or so I have been told. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Glenn, I wonder if running climate simulations on the DynexSolve distributed neuromorphic computing network might be faster and/or more accurate. It's still a work in progress and they might welcome the extra load. Their devs are active on their Discord channel. https://dynexcoin.org/about[/size]https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/ace9dd93beae65218cfc7abdbaf6d22e58e0075ed9b1cbf3fd76c153cd1c0eeb https://medium.com/@ares_61826/why-we-believe-the-dynex-cryptocurrency-is-a-scam-from-sec-sanctioned-daniel-mattes-561bbabbd89a Dynex is a scam. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
Dynex is a scam.Certainly enough red flags that I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Not proven to be a scam but no way am I going near it. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Compare it with Gridcoin, which only gets detected by 1 antivirus instead of 43.... https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/efe7ed5d983f43eb35b3e73db617e12c6254a7d3354aabac53ed6cda24de4c0cDynex is a scam.Certainly enough red flags that I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Not proven to be a scam but no way am I going near it. I told AVG staff to have a thorough look at it anyway. Sometimes they actually get back to you through the program and tell you the result. However my second link seems to imply Daniel Mattes (assuming it's the same one) is a bad guy, but he doesn't look bad to me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Mattes |
Send message Joined: 29 Oct 17 Posts: 1044 Credit: 16,200,454 RAC: 10,973 |
Glenn, I wonder if running climate simulations on the DynexSolve distributed neuromorphic computing network might be faster and/or more accurate. It's still a work in progress and they might welcome the extra load. Their devs are active on their Discord channel. https://dynexcoin.org/aboutNot something I have heard of - I have no idea what a neuromorphic network is; I presume it's just a fancy name for a neural network implemented on GPUs. Can't say it's of interest. There is no existing code for GPUs in any of the models that CPDN use. The forecasting centres are however working on including GPUs in the model codes. Try searching for 'atmospheric ocean models using GPU' and it will give hits. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
There is no existing code for GPUs in any of the models CPDN use. The forecasting centres are however working on including GPUs in the model codes. Try searching for 'atmospheric ocean models using GPU' and it will give hits.I assume those aren't available for us to run somewhere? Everyone using those does them in-house? |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Is WAH done for now? Wasn't the second last batch faulty and needs redone, the East Asia ones which crashed a lot? |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
Is WAH done for now? Wasn't the second last batch faulty and needs redone, the East Asia ones which crashed a lot?The fresh batch should arrive at some point but probably not before some more testing batches have appeared. The Korean scientist who is after the work will let us know when she is ready with the modified tasks. |
Send message Joined: 6 Jul 06 Posts: 147 Credit: 3,615,496 RAC: 420 |
Any new work for 64 bit coming along? I noticed a couple of new entries on the server status page OpenIFS 43r3 OpenIFS 43r3 Baroclinic Lifecycle OpenIFS 43r3 Perturbed Surface OpenIFS 43r3 Cubic Octahedral grid tco95 l91 OpenIFS 43r3 Linear grid tl255 l91 Thanks Conan |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4531 Credit: 18,702,225 RAC: 16,414 |
Any new work for 64 bit coming along? I noticed a couple of new entries on the server status page That just means, the initial work on the model types has been started. I would guess we are talking months rather than weeks before anything appears. |
Send message Joined: 29 Oct 17 Posts: 1044 Credit: 16,200,454 RAC: 10,973 |
I hadn't realised Andy has put them on the main site. Those models are still in development and may never be used - though I hope they will. They are the large memory OpenIFS variants.Any new work for 64 bit coming along? I noticed a couple of new entries on the server status pageThat just means, the initial work on the model types has been started. I would guess we are talking months rather than weeks before anything appears. Someone else asked about the Korean work. The spinup for the smaller region configuration has worked and may be sent out, but I'm working with Sarah to modify the WaH code so we can send out the original batch with fixes. CPDN will probably decide how to proceed next week when people come back from holiday. --- CPDN Visiting Scientist |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 04 Posts: 82 Credit: 69,818,270 RAC: 8,262 |
Glen I would like to ask you, do you have any idea how many of the new OpenIFS work(-unites) will have to be processed and how long they might last based your previous experience with the “test-batch” (I can´t remember, was it last year or this year?)? I’m asking as I bought 64 GB of RAM for climateprediction – do not really need for my daily tasks – the last time and I got a little bit upset as this OpenIFS units lasted only a few months and then you made the comment, the big OpenIFS unites might never make it to BOINC at all. Now I am looking forward to the new badge of OpenIFS units announced for October and I am wondering if I shall buy 128 GB of additional RAM for another computer in preparation/advance, however I really would like to avoid the same experience from last time, that this investment is only worth for a few months. Especially as I would be able to buy for the similar amount a graphic card for GPUGRID. Thanks a lot for your comments klepel |
Send message Joined: 29 Oct 17 Posts: 1044 Credit: 16,200,454 RAC: 10,973 |
I wouldn't suggest buying 128Gb of RAM, not unless you need it for something else. CPDN do not put out enough work in a year to justify spending on hardware (well, that's what I tell my wife anyway and then I try to get to the delivery packages before she sees them..... :) I said 'may not be used' because it's not my decision to put them into production - that's down to the Director of CPDN once we have run the tests. At the moment I have no reason to think they won't be but I don't know for sure. My idea is to use these new configs to repeat some experiments made couple of years ago with the existing OIFS config, and write it up to advertise this new capability. Hopefully to attract more scientists to use the platform. I can tell you we have successfully run higher resolution configurations of OpenIFS on the dev-site that use 11Gb & 20Gb RAM and CPDN has okayed testing an even higher one that uses ~28Gb RAM. I don't think we will go beyond that yet, as these models also produce more output that might cause issues when uploading (plus more I/O to disk). Because of the memory size, CPDN will also limit the no. of 'in progress' tasks a user can have so 64Gb you have already is fine. I can't answer when the new batches will go out - the model is working fine, it's just all the work around it for CPDN & boinc that takes the time. It's been agreed that credit will be increased for these hi-res configs to account for the increased memory used (which I think is only fair). But we still have a number of other steps to take first. Hope that answers your questions. Glen |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1120 Credit: 17,195,460 RAC: 2,697 |
I can tell you we have successfully run higher resolution configurations of OpenIFS on the dev-site that use 11Gb & 20Gb RAM and CPDN has okayed testing an even higher one that uses ~28Gb RAM. I don't think we will go beyond that yet, as these models also produce more output that might cause issues when uploading (plus more I/O to disk). Because of the memory size, CPDN will also limit the no. of 'in progress' tasks a user can have so 64Gb you have already is fine. My main machine runs Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.8 (Ootpa) and is like this: Computer 1511241 CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2245 CPU @ 3.90GHz [Family 6 Model 85 Stepping 7] Number of processors 16 Operating System Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 (Ootpa) [4.18.0-477.15.1.el8_8.x86_64|libc 2.28] BOINC version 7.20.2 Memory 125.08 GB Cache 16896 KB Swap space 15.62 GB Total disk space 488.04 GB Free Disk Space 480.57 GB Measured floating point speed 6.02 billion ops/sec Measured integer speed 25.36 billion ops/sec Average upload rate 139.34 KB/sec Average download rate 22391.7 KB/sec I normally have it run 12 Boinc tasks at a time. My Internet connection isVerizon FiOS guaranteed to run at 75 Megabits/second. It acrually gets response like this. CPDN reports slower upload speeds than download speeds.I do not know why the speeds should be so different. I do not believe the download speeds are as fast as CPDN says. Those speeds could be true if they were in Kilobits per second, but KBytes per second is not really possible. When I was getting oifs jobs, the trickles went up quite fast as long as the upload servers were running. I guess I could run one 28 GByte Oifs task at a time as well as some smaller tasks at the same time. Timestamp Download Upload Latency Jitter Quality Score Test Server 8/30/2023 17:9:28 76.65 Mbps 89.02 Mbps 4 ms 2 ms Excellent speedtest1.nyc1.nitelusa.net.prod.hosts.ooklaserver.net 6/7/2023 20:3:31 78.13 Mbps 63.66 Mbps 6 ms 1 ms Excellent ny2.speedtest.gslnetworks.com.prod.hosts.ooklaserver.net 5/5/2023 11:23:28 76.26 Mbps 89.16 Mbps 6 ms 1 ms Excellent speedtest.nyc.rr.com |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Jean-David and me could both run 4 28GB tasks at once. It would be a pity to limit the number. Can the server alter the limit based on the host's RAM? Also I take it this limit is per host? I have 10 machines.... |
©2024 cpdn.org