|
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Run Linux work units with Windows 10 WSL
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
To my utter astonishment, it is possible to run the Linux work units (e.g., N216) under Windows 10 WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) without VirtualBox or any other VM. I think it uses Hyper-V, but that is irrelevant to me. How practical it is is another matter; you don't have a GUI, and have to use the BOINC command lines (boinccmd). And while I have it running, I am not sure how to get it to survive a reboot. Maybe the Linux experts can help. But in BoincTasks, it is even recognized: WSL detected: I think Richard Haselgrove had something to do with that, and maybe he can chime in. The basic procedures are: (1) Install WSL 2 (you need a recent Win10 version): https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install-win10 (2) Select the Linux version you want (I used Ubuntu 20.04). (3) Open a command window by opening "ubuntu2004.exe" (located in C:\Users\ (Username)\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps\CanonicalGroupLimited.Ubuntu20.04onWindows_79rhkp1fndgsc (4) Install the 32-bit libraries for your version of Linux (sudo apt install lib32ncurses6 lib32z1 lib32stdc++-7-dev) (5) Install BOINC: "sudo apt install boinc" (6) Start BOINC by just typing "boinc" in a first window, and then, without closing it, (7) Open a second command window and execute: boinccmd --project_attach https://climateprediction.net/ xxxxyyyyzzzz, where xxxxyyyyzzzz is your Account Key (https://www.cpdn.org/weak_auth.php). It is running now. I need to polish it up a bit to make it more practical. https://www.cpdn.org/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1514666 |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2172 Credit: 64,679,970 RAC: 3,208 |
I wondered if anyone was doing that. Microsoft is supposed to be bringing an integrated way of running Linux GUI apps in WSL. I'll be interested to see if it plays nice with boinc. https://medium.com/for-linux-users/gui-linux-on-windows-is-coming-7c199b15b72 |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
It looks like shutting the boinc window, followed by a reboot breaks the work unit and does not allow it to pick up where it left off when BOINC is restarted. That is not surprising, but limits the use of it in a Windows desktop environment. I have asked on the BoincTasks forum whether it could be adapted to manage BOINC running under WSL. That would be convenient. EDIT: It does come back to life after a few minutes of inactivity, but only by downloading a new work unit. It seems to be running OK now, but any prior work was lost.. https://www.cpdn.org/workunit.php?wuid=12063595 Unfortunately I can't run this machine that way, and will have to detach. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2172 Credit: 64,679,970 RAC: 3,208 |
What if you ran in another terminal window boinccmd --quit before you close the window you ran the boinc command in? Will that cleanly exit boinc? |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
That works better. I get an "Exiting" line after running boinccmd --quit. Then, if I start BOINC again, it seems to start up again OK. Finally, I just closed the BOINC window again without the --quit, and it killed the work unit again. I will try more tomorrow after I get another work unit after the 1 hour delay. Maybe someone can automate this to allow for graceful reboots? EDIT: Before we get too far down the road, I can foresee the next problem. Even though I have the resource share set to "0", the Linux work units of course don't know about the Windows ones I am running on 10 cores of my Ryzen 3600 (plus reserving a core to support the GPU). So it is likely that I will see a whole bunch of Linux N216 work units that I can't really use. I want only one. But I will have to wait and see how it handles that. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2172 Credit: 64,679,970 RAC: 3,208 |
Maybe you can create a global preferences override file and limit the CPU usage to 1 core in Linux if that's all your going to run? If you are going to run other projects as well in Linux, that wouldn't work well. https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Global_prefs_override.xml Or possibly use app_config.xml to limit the number of work units downloaded/running for cpdn. https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Client_configuration#Application_configuration |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Maybe you can create a global preferences override file and limit the CPU usage to 1 core in Linux if that's all your going to run? I may be OK. I had limited the CPUs to 10%, meaning that only one work unit would run at a time on my 12-core Ryzen 3600. And it has been over two hours since downloading the work unit that is running, so that should have been time for two more. But I haven't received any more. (And I keep the default buffer of 0.1 + 0.5 days). It probably accomplishes the same thing that the global preferences do, but I could try that if needed. I don't know about the app_config. I think that just limits the ones that are running, but does not affect the downloads. But I have no estimate of completion time without any manager. I will have to rely on the trickles in a couple of days, if I can keep it going that long. Thanks. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2172 Credit: 64,679,970 RAC: 3,208 |
boinccmd --get_tasks will give you a text listing of the tasks, their CPU time so far (in seconds), estimated time to completion (also in seconds), and percent done, among other things. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
boinccmd --get_tasks will give you a text listing of the tasks, their CPU time so far (in seconds), estimated time to completion (also in seconds), and percent done, among other things. Wonderful. But I am not quite sure it gives consistent results, though before my first cup of coffee I won't vouch for anything. But the fraction done (after 9 hours) suggests that the total time is less than 9 days. If that is accurate, it is faster than on an Ubuntu 20.04 machine itself. And on the Windows side, I have 10 WCG/OPN running (plus a GPU on Folding). They don't seem much disturbed either. name: hadam4h_a14o_209511_5_895_012064086_0 |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Here is the word from fred on BoincTasks: https://forum.efmer.com/index.php?topic=1974.0 |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2172 Credit: 64,679,970 RAC: 3,208 |
It says you've run 8+ hours, are 4.4% done, and have 1800 hours left. Whereas, doing the math, it should take about 200 hours total. The boinc estimate for time remaining is not a good estimate I would think. Benchmarks haven't been run, so use boinccmd to run them boinccmd --run_benchmarks boinc may be using the low benchmark scores to give time to completion estimates since your FP benchmark is the default of 1 billion ops/sec and it should be 5+ billion. It probably won't change the estimates much for this task, but for future tasks it should give a better estimate. |
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 19 Posts: 108 Credit: 3,012,142 RAC: 0 |
Here is the manual page for boinccmd: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Boinccmd_tool That might help you get the most out of it. Another thought is editing/creating the remote_hosts.cfg and adding your windows IP address and computer name e.g.: # This file contains a list of hostnames or IP addresses (one per line) # of remote hosts, that are allowed to connect and to control the local # BOINC core client via GUI RPCs. # Lines beginning with a # or a ; are treated like comments and will be # ignored. # #host.example.com #192.168.0.180 192.168.1.2 desktop-pc Then you should be able to point the BOINC GUI to what ever IP address WSL is using. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Benchmarks haven't been run, so use boinccmd to run them I will certainly do that when this one is complete. I don't want to touch anything now. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
That might help you get the most out of it. Another thought is editing/creating the remote_hosts.cfg and adding your windows IP address and computer name e.g.:Actually, I got rid of the remote_hosts.cfg file on my Linux machines so that I can reach any of them without restrictions. I like your idea of just pointing the BOINC GUI to it. In my cc_config.xml file, I normally put: <allow_remote_gui_rpc>1</allow_remote_gui_rpc>though I had not gotten around to putting the cc_config in yet. It might work, after this one is finished and I can reboot. EDIT: It looks like the default port for the BOINC GUI is 31416. I am presently using that one for my Windows version of BOINC. I will probably have to chose a different one for the Linux version, since they are both on the same machine. But it should work. Thanks. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Remarkable. It all worked. I took the risk of shutting down properly (after including the cc_config.xml), and rebooted. Then I started up again and directed the GUI to port 31418: boinc --gui_rpc_port 31418 Finally, I added that to BoincTasks, and I see it (along with the Windows side). Also, I ran the CPU benchmarks from there, and so it should be better estimates eventually. Now I just need to figure out how to reboot without having to shut down, for best reliability. Thanks to all. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
I needed to reboot, so I suspended the work unit with BoincTasks (at a checkpoint no less), thinking that would make it safe for a reboot. But it wasn't. The work unit errored out upon restart. So you have to use "boinccmd --quit" to shut it down safely. That will make it difficult to use. |
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 19 Posts: 108 Credit: 3,012,142 RAC: 0 |
I needed to reboot, so I suspended the work unit with BoincTasks (at a checkpoint no less), thinking that would make it safe for a reboot. You could try issuing several "sync" commands in a row before the reboot. I have no idea how Win10 will handle it (It might even just ignore it) but it may be worth a try. I have RAID array that does a constant 2-6 megabytes per second in writes for WCG OPN1 tasks and no matter what I tried CPDN tasks failed on every reboot because the work doesn't get written to disk before the system restarts. If WSL the kind of containerization that used your CPU's virtualization instructions you might have the same problem I do. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Suspending at a checkpoint should write all the files to disk I would think. You might as well just issue the "boinccmd --quit", which works anyway. But I really need an automated way to do it for each shutdown, not issue a command. However, it was running well. My first trickle was 16.6457 sec/TS, and that was with 10 OPN plus a GPU on the Windows side. I think I will try two N216 and 9 OPN and see how they run. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
Although WSL runs very efficiently, it is really not for the ordinary user, but for developers who use command-line tools. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/faq To run BOINC, it is probably better to use the procedure outlined on Universe by rsNeutrino (starting at message #4565) https://universeathome.pl/universe/forum_thread.php?id=551 The newest Ubuntu version is Ubuntu 20.04.2 (https://ubuntu.com/download/desktop). It probably runs as fast, since that method is based on Hyper-V also. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 637 Credit: 26,751,529 RAC: 653 |
The first two trickles are in when running two N216 at a time, and they average around 17.4 sec/TS. https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=22016583 https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=21996625 That is very similar to an identical Ryzen 3600 running Ubuntu 20.04.1 directly, except that it had Rosetta (plus a GPU) on the other cores rather than OPN. https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=21997198 https://www.cpdn.org/result.php?resultid=22013894 So I don't think you will see any loss running the Linux work units on a Windows machine. It is just a question of how to manage it best. |
©2024 climateprediction.net