Message boards :
Number crunching :
New work Discussion
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 82 · 83 · 84 · 85 · 86 · 87 · 88 . . . 91 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1120 Credit: 17,199,602 RAC: 2,377 |
hadam4h does not seem to be new. I have a whole bunch of them completed from the past. Here is one: Task 22177880 Name hadam4h_h1g7_201011_5_889_012045366_3 Workunit 12045366 Created 24 Dec 2021, 4:52:28 UTC Sent 28 Dec 2021, 13:14:26 UTC Report deadline 10 Dec 2022, 18:34:26 UTC Received 6 Jan 2022, 12:03:52 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x00000000) Computer ID 1511241 Run time 8 days 0 hours 7 min 19 sec CPU time 7 days 22 hours 17 min 50 sec Validate state Valid Credit 33,854.34 |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
[titter] Boinc is a wonderful platform which never ever goes wrong and everything always works perfectly. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
[titter] Boinc is a wonderful platform which never ever goes wrong and everything always works perfectly. __________ What was that all about? LOL |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
Peter has made two posts criticizing BOINC, and adding words at the end which are against forum rules. So I've been deleting them. Has latest post is similar, but saying that BOINC is nice, and without the unacceptable words. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
Peter has made two posts criticizing BOINC, and adding words at the end which are against forum rules.ROFL! You didn't notice I was being sarcastic then (hence the [titter]). So the forum rules state we must worship Boinc programmers? I used no swearwords.... do you have a special list of words for this forum? I was actually banned from a forum for saying "damn", because the mod was very religious. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
We all have our own idiosyncrasy. Water under the bridge. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 690 Credit: 4,391,754 RAC: 6,918 |
We all have our own idiosyncrasy. Water under the bridge.Still not sure what rule I broke! |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
We all have our own idiosyncrasy. Water under the bridge.Still not sure what rule I broke! Peter, life is unsure and sometimes not fair. We have all been through it. I miss Mo'v and our conversations, but? |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
What is a buffin? <core_client_version>7.16.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234)</message> <stderr_txt> CPDN Monitor - Quit request from BOINC... Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Model crashed: READDUMP: BAD BUFFIN OF DATA tmp/xnnuj.pipe_dummy Sorry, too many model crashes! :-( 03:39:26 (2934): called boinc_finish(22) </stderr_txt> ]]> |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1120 Credit: 17,199,602 RAC: 2,377 |
What is a buffin? I think another thing to find out is why your data are coming in through a pipe and not a file? Or a misleadingly named file tmp. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 04 Posts: 7629 Credit: 24,240,330 RAC: 0 |
I think the problem may be the BOINC version. For the BOINC site, it says that version is experimental. So, where did you get that version version 7.16.6? |
Send message Joined: 12 Apr 21 Posts: 315 Credit: 14,628,668 RAC: 17,942 |
7.16.6 probably came from a package installation. When I installed BOINC from a package on Ubuntu 20.04 that's the version I got. On 22.04 the version is 7.18.1. For Linux machines, according to the site, it's recommended to install BOINC using a package manager. I've also gotten "bad buffin of data" errors before and would also like to know what they mean. |
Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 490 Credit: 30,829,918 RAC: 12,273 |
From memory when I installed BOINC on Ubuntu 20.xx I used from the terminal screen sudo apt-get install boinc-client boinc-manager rather than the package install. No apparent problems. |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2184 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
These errors were discussed in this thread awhile back. https://www.cpdn.org/forum_thread.php?id=8701#59554 I'm not sure anything was resolved. When I infrequently get them. it was usually in a task or tasks where I exited boinc and restarted. |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
I think the problem may be the BOINC version. (sudo apt-get install boinc-client boinc-manager) Is anything wrong and if it is wrong then the instructions given on the Boinc web site should be changed for us. Some WU's are normal. |
Send message Joined: 6 Jul 06 Posts: 147 Credit: 3,615,496 RAC: 420 |
[quote]7.16.6 probably came from a package installation. When I installed BOINC from a package on Ubuntu 20.04 that's the version I got. On 22.04 the version is 7.18.1. For Linux machines, according to the site, it's recommended to install BOINC using a package manager. I know this is getting off topic, I used a package manager version only the once. Found it stuck pieces of BOINC every where, had trouble finding and maintaining it that way, plus all the permission problems (why do they insist on a separate user to control the BOINC install?), also installed as a service which I then had to learn how to control from the command line. So any other Linux install I have done or updates have all been from the BOINC website and it all works fine, all in one place (still a small permission problem but that is easy to fix). So if it recommended for Linux users to use a package manager I don't agree with it. Conan |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 1120 Credit: 17,199,602 RAC: 2,377 |
My boinc-client is 7.16.11 that I got from EPEL for my RHEL8.6 distro of Linux. Similarly for boinc mgr. [/usr/bin]$ ls -l boinc* -rwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1112600 Feb 17 19:00 boinc -rwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1112600 Feb 17 19:00 boinc_client -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 359416 Feb 17 19:00 boinccmd -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4078328 Feb 17 19:00 boincmgr -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 351040 Feb 17 19:00 boincscr $ rpm -qf boincmgr boinc_client boinc-manager-7.16.11-9.el8.x86_64 boinc-client-7.16.11-9.el8.x86_64 |
Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 204 Credit: 7,608,986 RAC: 0 |
If the Boinc site is giving instructions to do "sudo apt-get install boinc-client boinc-manager" then it is their responsibility to place the proper version from where ever this command gets it. Anyway, what's done, is done. I am not going to abort just to change versions. As it is, even if I look or sneeze too hard, the WU goes into error. |
Send message Joined: 15 May 09 Posts: 4532 Credit: 18,781,852 RAC: 19,551 |
If the Boinc site is giving instructions to do "sudo apt-get install boinc-client boinc-manager" then it is their responsibility to place the proper version from where ever this command gets it. I see the responsibility as being with the package managers to keep up to date with the releases. However BOINC and many other program developers do not keep all their instructions up to date all the time and those responsible for keeping package managers up to date will always have to prioritise which packages to check most often. |
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 07 Posts: 1059 Credit: 36,638,634 RAC: 15,033 |
Actually, it's the responsibility of the software packager (in this case, the Linux repository maintainers) to take an appropriate snapshot of the BOINC source code, and package it in a way that suits their distribution and its management tools. That's the way the Linux world works. |
©2024 cpdn.org