climateprediction.net home page
Client performance

Client performance

Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
Pconfig

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 84
Credit: 76,646
RAC: 0
Message 241 - Posted: 6 Aug 2004, 21:11:33 UTC

Hi,

i would like to know how many sec/ts you guys have with your systems.

I have 2.35 sec/ts with a Ahtlon XP 2600 @ 2140 MHz
ID: 241 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user357

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 14,787
RAC: 0
Message 260 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 1:12:58 UTC - in response to Message 241.  

I've got about 2.82 with an Athlon XP 3000 @ 2.16Ghz.

A dual Opteron 250 would be so nice right now...
ID: 260 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
belgix

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 85
Credit: 2,924,043
RAC: 0
Message 263 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 2:03:11 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2004, 2:04:36 UTC

For me 3.72 s/TS with a Intel Pentium 4 Mobile @ 1600 MHz.

Not the fastest Toshiba laptop ... but very reliable!
ID: 263 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tiker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 27
Credit: 766,972
RAC: 0
Message 270 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 2:45:50 UTC - in response to Message 263.  

Where's everyone reading the sec/ts from?

I see on my system, bottom line of the screensaver graphic, I'm getting about 7.46 s/TS on phase 1 of 3 but that seems a bit high for my system compared to everyone else's stats so far. Currently running a dual p3-733 with only 1 WU going at the moment. (Host ID 369).
---
Jabber Status: <IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/jabber/ed.php">
<IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/boinc/sig.php?id=925&amp;project=pah"> <IMG SRC="http://www.funkymonkey.org/boinc/sig.php?id=169421&amp;project=sah">
ID: 270 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John McLeod VII
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 172
Credit: 4,023,611
RAC: 0
Message 271 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 3:04:29 UTC - in response to Message 270.  

&gt; Where's everyone reading the sec/ts from?
&gt;
&gt; I see on my system, bottom line of the screensaver graphic, I'm getting about
&gt; 7.46 s/TS on phase 1 of 3 but that seems a bit high for my system compared to
&gt; everyone else's stats so far. Currently running a dual p3-733 with only 1 WU
&gt; going at the moment. (Host ID 369).
&gt; ---
The lower the number is, the faster you are crunching. Your's does not seem that far out of line.

jm7
ID: 271 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tiker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 27
Credit: 766,972
RAC: 0
Message 272 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 3:08:52 UTC - in response to Message 271.  

&gt; The lower the number is, the faster you are crunching. Your's does not seem
&gt; that far out of line.

Ah, low number wins. Cool. :)
ID: 272 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user355

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 187
Credit: 44,163
RAC: 0
Message 278 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 6:15:32 UTC

Just tried the screensaver on my system, and my monitor goes to standby (off) and is unrecoverable until system is reset.

AMD FX-53
Win XP Pro SP1
Radeon x800 Pro

No BSOD, no dumps, no events, etc...
ID: 278 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user156
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 282 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 7:14:54 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2004, 7:16:21 UTC

From visualisation: 1.95 s/timestep (Trickles at 5h52m intervals = 1.955 s/timestep.) machine name Emma, CP-boinc computer No.140 - AMD Athlon 2500+ XP-M - Spec' 14x133.3 for 1.87Ghz 1.45Vcore running at 13x200 for 2.6Ghz 1.8Vcore watercooled.
ID: 282 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Clasprea

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 390,556
RAC: 0
Message 290 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 9:19:27 UTC

Hi!
I have 2.66 s./TS with a pentium 4 2.4 Ghz.
ID: 290 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user147

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 30
Credit: 422,225
RAC: 0
Message 297 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 10:10:18 UTC

My P4 (Northwood) 1.6 GHz @ 2 Ghz has 3.39 sec/ts. The cp-bonic-client is about 20% faster than the classic cp-client was.
ID: 297 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Desti

Send message
Joined: 6 Aug 04
Posts: 124
Credit: 9,195,838
RAC: 0
Message 302 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 10:30:28 UTC - in response to Message 241.  

Time Sent (UTC) Phase Timestep CPU Time (sec) Average
06 Aug 2004 23:45:21 1 10802 25846 2.3927050546195

Athlon 64 3000+ PC2700 CL.2.5 Linux-2.6.7
ID: 302 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Mathias

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 2
Credit: 25,545
RAC: 0
Message 305 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 11:15:56 UTC

My Athlon XP 1800+ @2000MHz has 4,21sec/ts. The old client was working faster on my machine
ID: 305 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user175

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 36
Credit: 2,559,795
RAC: 0
Message 310 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 13:06:04 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2004, 13:06:50 UTC

quad p4 xeon here, running 4 wu's concurrently and looks like 6.47 s/TS at cpu time of 36:41:36


Xcamel
ID: 310 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
eeyan

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 10
Credit: 611,344
RAC: 0
Message 311 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 13:15:53 UTC

3.05 sec/ts on a 2.4GHz HT P4 running one boinc model and classic at the same time
ID: 311 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Will H

Send message
Joined: 6 Aug 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 708,168
RAC: 0
Message 315 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 14:22:13 UTC

8.38 s/TS on an Athlon Thunderbird 1Ghz
ID: 315 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user162

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 333,453
RAC: 0
Message 324 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 15:36:03 UTC

4.34 Sec/TS on Athlon XP 2400+ (2000MHz) Linux 2.4.20-8
ID: 324 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user176

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 57,164
RAC: 0
Message 335 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 16:25:16 UTC

3.16 s/TS on a 3.06GHz P4 Dell laptop
ID: 335 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 299,864
RAC: 0
Message 338 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 17:11:37 UTC - in response to Message 335.  
Last modified: 7 Aug 2004, 17:11:51 UTC

2.42 s/TS on my AMD 64 3200+ on Windows

which is a bit slower than other AMD64's, I believe because my memory isn't so great (166 etc).
ID: 338 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cespenar

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 2
Credit: 312,669
RAC: 0
Message 343 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 19:04:01 UTC

4.26 s/TS

Athlon XP 2000+ (1666 MHz) with 512 MB SDRAM, Linux 2.6.7.
ID: 343 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user63

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 39
Credit: 285,707
RAC: 0
Message 354 - Posted: 7 Aug 2004, 22:23:44 UTC

2.47 s/ts

shuttle xpc sn45g with nforce2ultra400, barton 3200+, 512mb pc400 AND running legacy cpdn at the same time (cpu time sharing ^^)
<a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=11">
<img src="http://www.fbs-stadtliga-cb.de/pics/wtbanner_sn45g.gif"></a>
ID: 354 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance

©2021 climateprediction.net