climateprediction.net home page
newbie: confused by what \"to completion\" is meant to be

newbie: confused by what \"to completion\" is meant to be

Questions and Answers : Windows : newbie: confused by what \"to completion\" is meant to be
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile old_user147568

Send message
Joined: 9 Jan 06
Posts: 4
Credit: 4,555
RAC: 0
Message 19542 - Posted: 22 Jan 2006, 19:43:26 UTC

Not sure if I should post here or at BOINC, but did a search and found nothing.

I\'ve been running my first climateprediction.net project for just over a week now, and am very confused by the \"to completion\" column in BOINC manager. What is this showing me?

BOINC mgr currently shows me 128:17h CPU time and 8.44% complete, suggesting a total CPU time of 128:17/8.44 = 1519 CPU hours. This then gives, by my calculation, 1519 - 128 = 1319 hours to completion. However the \"to completion\" column shows 1479h and has only reduced by 6 hours in the last few days (~60h CPU time).

Am I missing something?

I am using BOINC mgr 5.2.13 under WinXP.
ID: 19542 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
crandles
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 692
Credit: 277,679
RAC: 0
Message 19550 - Posted: 22 Jan 2006, 20:50:18 UTC

The to completeion time is very poorly calculated until you have done a few work units. Your 1519 total hours should be reasonably accurate.

BOINC used to be good at this for CPDN ( and calculate 1519 same as you have) but poor for other projects. BOINC improved its method for other projects but now it acts in this manner of not being good until a few work units have been done.

HTH
Visit BOINC WIKI for help

And join BOINC Synergy for all the news in one place.
ID: 19550 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user113184
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 05
Posts: 18
Credit: 1,856
RAC: 0
Message 19652 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 18:14:43 UTC - in response to Message 19550.  

my to completion time ia also a bit erratic it has gone from about 2000 hrs to 2300 so i might suspend other projects every now and then for a day or two just to bring the time down a bit ive got till 22/11/06 to finish it so am not to worried .
also will i be wasting my time if other people finish the same wu first ???
ID: 19652 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Pooh Bear 27
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 05
Posts: 465
Credit: 1,914,189
RAC: 0
Message 19653 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 19:05:35 UTC - in response to Message 19652.  

my to completion time ia also a bit erratic it has gone from about 2000 hrs to 2300 so i might suspend other projects every now and then for a day or two just to bring the time down a bit ive got till 22/11/06 to finish it so am not to worried .
also will i be wasting my time if other people finish the same wu first ???


Do not worry about due dates. If you trickle every so often, getting it back late is not an issue.

I have run several, and I think my slowest one was about 8 months, but I have bad memory, so it may not have taken that long.

Welcome to the project. Sit back, enjoy.


ID: 19653 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 19654 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 19:46:46 UTC

> also will i be wasting my time if other people finish the same wu first ???

There is no \'quorum\' as with other projects. The only one processing that set of parameters is you. Unless the model on your computer fails, in which case that data set will be marked for possible re-issue.

ID: 19654 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile old_user113184
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 05
Posts: 18
Credit: 1,856
RAC: 0
Message 19674 - Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 17:27:32 UTC - in response to Message 19654.  

thanks i will keep on crunching
ID: 19674 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : newbie: confused by what \"to completion\" is meant to be

©2024 climateprediction.net