Posts by Admiral

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Just set up WinXp 64 pro (Message 1315) Posted 20 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: Hi! I just set up WinXP 64 Pro on my PC. It\'s beta but i tried to start Boinc. t works because WinXP 64 seems to have a gerat emulator, but do i have a bit more performance even if i emulate 32 Bit client???? <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
22) Message boards : Number crunching : IRC channel availible (Message 1314) Posted 20 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > Channel #cpdn is now up on irc.freenode.net for chat, troubleshooting, general > client/application discussions. > > Most messaging clients now support irc on linux, windows, and mac platforms. > Drop in and say "Hi!" > > Lol okay i join ! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
23) Questions and Answers : Getting started : @Carl: What happened with the RSS News Feed? (Message 1313) Posted 20 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: I can\'t find it on the new site! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
24) Questions and Answers : Wish list : Smaller wu\'s (Message 1246) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: That was already discussed in the old CPDN Forum... You know from overclockers that it depends a little bit on the CPU what you calculate. So you can't split the model in e.g 1 Modelyear WU which is calculated by several CPUs! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
25) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 1245) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > As an example, my 3.2Ghz HT starts comsuming about 75 watts more power > when > > the Boinc client kicks in from idle. That translates into alot of heat; > a > > good cooling system and keeping it clean are essential. As noted before, > heat > > slows the CPU down. > > > > > No true in AMD case! > > > Please more precise pconfig, what do you mean. My CU is getting very hot while running CPDN <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
26) Message boards : Number crunching : To Completion Time (Message 1244) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > Progress 0.04% To Completion 626:03:55 > is this for real ? > > Yes teh CPDN WUs are very Long. i ahve a AMD 64 3200+ and have around 450 hours per WU <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
27) Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC Dev Task base URL (Message 1235) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > You can view the BOINC developement task base at the link below. > > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/taskbase/database.cgi > > > K. > > LOL! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
28) Message boards : Number crunching : CPDNSpy 1.3 (Message 1223) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > Thanks, Admiral. This gives me enough information to build my own 'end > of > > trickle/end of phase/end of model' calculator. > > Cheers, > > > > PeterV. > > <IMG> SRC="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=4&trans=off"> > > > > > > What do you mean? Time to end of...? I have integrated that already in the > next CPDnSpy build I'll release soon > <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13"> > Has any1 tested teh client one mac yet? I recognized one error in the Linux/Mac version that occurs under Linux. I'll fix that today! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
29) Questions and Answers : Getting started : CPDNSpy 1.3 not in Addon List (Message 1222) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: Hey Carl I\'ve added my program to the Boinc Developer site. Why is it not listed? <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
30) Message boards : Number crunching : When Do Credits Occur? (Message 1221) Posted 19 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > You will receive credits few minutes after the completion of your first > trickle. One trickle = 10802 time step (TS) & one trickle = appr 75.6 > credits. > > and when are the Top Stats pages updatet? all 4 hours like the legacy CPDN pages? <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
31) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 1201) Posted 18 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > As an example, my 3.2Ghz HT starts comsuming about 75 watts more power when > the Boinc client kicks in from idle. That translates into alot of heat; a > good cooling system and keeping it clean are essential. As noted before, heat > slows the CPU down. > > > > <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=35&team=off"><a> href="http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/thefinalfrontear/index.html">The > Final Front Ear<a> > Hmm have no money for another Fan <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
32) Message boards : climateprediction.net Science : Hey... new page??? (Message 1191) Posted 18 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: hey the site is getting better and better! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
33) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 1173) Posted 18 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > About the benchmarks... > > > > I ran them 5 times over a few hours period on my laptop. The first time > I ran > > them they were really high (2190 float point, 4400 integer) for a p4 > 3Ghz > > laptop, .5GB ram, XP Pro, the next time about half (1400 fp, 2800 i), > next > > (1100 fp, 2600 i), next about normal (1050 fp, 2500 i), and this is where > they > > stayed. The first was run on a cold (literally) computer. The only > > difference between one and the next was time and temperature. Seems a > little > > odd to vary by such a huge amount. Makes you wonder about the accuracy > of the > > benchmark. > > > > Andrew > > > > > > If the temperature of the p4 gets too high (~70Â°C) "thermal throttling" is > activated, which means that the processor gets slower. > > in this article it was tested: > http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/p4-throttling/ > > the only thing that would help is better cooling. > > Hmm... my PC is getting very hot while running CPDN. Perhaps that's the reason for my performance lag <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
34) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 1102) Posted 17 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > > Hy Scott, > > > > > > Duron 1400 Mhz, 256MB, W2k, 5.0 s/TS > > > > > > > > > > > > > How confusing, I have double the memory, Windows XP, and a Duron 1800MHZ > and > > your s/TS is lower? > > > > Do you use the computer? or is it a dedicated system? > > > I`m using the System normally for my E-Mail and Office. A important faktor is > the cache memory size of the Prozessor. ItÂ´s for the all Duron the same > (256kb). Perhaps the quality of the normal mainboard RAM (Kingston 256 MB > CL2)? The quality of the mainboard? But IÂ´ve got a cheap ECS L7S7A2. > > Also i think itÂ´s not so much difference between 5.1 and 5.0 s/TS. > > The motherboard is important for the performance.... but i think it's also a prob that the client semms to be intl optimized <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
35) Message boards : climateprediction.net Science : Hey... new page??? (Message 1067) Posted 16 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > Just recognized that the Beta page is now in normal CPDN layout!!!! > > <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13"> > > > Yeah, much better. > Thanks to CPDN team... > > they are preparing he officiel start! Yippie! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
36) Message boards : climateprediction.net Science : Hey... new page??? (Message 1053) Posted 16 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: Just recognized that the Beta page is now in normal CPDN layout!!!! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
37) Message boards : Number crunching : CPDNSpy 1.3 (Message 1000) Posted 15 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > Thanks, Admiral. This gives me enough information to build my own 'end of > trickle/end of phase/end of model' calculator. > Cheers, > > PeterV. > <IMG SRC="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=4&trans=off"> > > What do you mean? Time to end of...? I have integrated that already in the next CPDnSpy build I'll release soon <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
38) Message boards : Number crunching : CPDNSpy 1.3 (Message 997) Posted 15 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > BTW, Admiral, where do you get the TS info from in 'doze? Its easy in linux as > there is a line logged for each timestep containing TS, s/TS average, etc, and > it only takes a couple of lines of shell script to produce 'time of next/last > trickle', etc. Doze, even using the cli, doesn't provide a (easy to find) > log. > Cheers, > > PeterV. > <IMG SRC="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=4&trans=off"> > > The first value s/TS is calcualted as follows: i wrote parser that won't crash with the damaged client_state.xml so i can readout the CPUTime. from another XML File in the WU directory i can read out the current TS. Then i divide the time trhough the TS. The anothe value Acutual perofrmance. Counts the time from one update of the XMl file WU dir to the next and divides that time through the calculated TS in that time. That's all :-) BTW: Recognized error in Linux version. Will update that soon! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
39) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 986) Posted 14 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: Strange my client rusn faster on Linux!!!! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">
40) Message boards : Number crunching : Client performance (Message 982) Posted 14 Aug 2004 by Admiral_Hawkes Post: > > >> http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/cpu.html > > > > Hi, that page is just something I threw together for pc's that have > trickled > > at least once, it's generated once a day. I put an .xml.gz (gzip > compressed > > xml) in the /stats dir > > > > > it appears that cpdn/boinc is Pentium4/WindowsXP-"centric" so far! I > will > > experiment with other options. Unfortunately Mac's are a bit > underrepresented > > due to the sluggishness of the Mac Fortran versus Intel. > > > Hi Carl, > > Something curious about this table. My dual Opteron 246 running Linux with > 2.14s/TS and 2.21s/TS seems to have slowed down from 2.175s/TS to 6.167. > > Flying the flag for Linux :) > > Linux rules. I have a much better performance on it!!! i hope 64 Bit Client will appear soon!!!!!!!!!!!! <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=13">

Previous 20 · Next 20

Posts by Admiral_Hawkes