1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Opteron 280 crashes - linux
(Message 23131)
Posted 12 Jun 2006 by old_user175 Post: Are you actually using that computer??? Using it \"some\" - the problem is the app won\'t even accually start - it loads, then just sits there. no cpu time at all. every other project runs like a racehorse. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Opteron 280 crashes - linux
(Message 23116)
Posted 12 Jun 2006 by old_user175 Post: dual/dual Op 280\'s on FC4 (smp) 2GB memory, 578GB raid drivespace hadxxxx5.0x refuses to run - error -161 running fine again on the Op 248\'s and Op 250\'s any ideas? |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Too much Credits granted ?
(Message 6218)
Posted 19 Nov 2004 by old_user175 Post: PFFFFT!!!! Looks like I got robbed for 100,000 points... I'd really like to know what the heck is "up" |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A headsup...
(Message 5260)
Posted 12 Oct 2004 by old_user175 Post: BTW - nice charts Seeing the same thing after a nice recovery in RAC after a big drop. could it be more complex models or "end of phase 3" increased resolution (longer worktimes) ?? JSC aka Xcamel Team Weather CPUnderground |
5)
Message boards :
Cafe CPDN :
sig test
(Message 4834)
Posted 30 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: one more |
6)
Message boards :
Cafe CPDN :
sig test
(Message 4833)
Posted 30 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: me too.. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
RAC dropping like a
(Message 4773)
Posted 29 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: What is up with the slow downward slide of the RAC?? I saw this a few times in beta/boinc/seti and thought it was all fixed... Any ideas??? JSC aka Xcamel |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Installing new CPU
(Message 4772)
Posted 29 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: I've upgraded several boxes over time and have had no problems.. an OS change, now that's an issue.... |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Performance/MIPS
(Message 3195)
Posted 7 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: You describe the long and the short of it willy1. It doesn't matter if it's linux or windoze anymore, the benchmarks are equally bad. "Good enough" as John mentioned was supposed to be a very short-term bugfix, which has now turned into what seems a long term feature. Even true smp benches worse than a single proc mb of equal power. If you "roll your own" boinc_client, you'll gain some on the FP bench, and little or nothing on the INT bench. And yes it DOES have a direct effect on how much credit you claim and have granted, because credit is calculated on time-to-complete vs your benchmark. FWIW JSC aka Xcamel <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
IRC reminder
(Message 3085)
Posted 5 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: General meeting/chat area for cpdn/boinc is at irc.freenode.net channel #cpdn - open discussion - boinc (beta & cpdn) platforms, crunching, teams etc. JSC aka Xcamel <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Performance/MIPS
(Message 2615)
Posted 2 Sep 2004 by old_user175 Post: This has been an ongoing issue with boinc since last year when the benchmarking models changed. some rather powerful cpu's benchmark very badly, especially with HT enabled for both the windows and linux platforms. I resigned myself to the fact that ssl will not address the issue, and has no apparent desire to change it. I have a dual P4 3.06GHz xeon running Linux.latest.smp with HT enabled. The benchmark(s) look like a pIII on a bad day. Solution: Disable HT, reboot, benchmark, reboot, enable HT, and start your model run. As long as you don't change boinc client rev in the process, your machine won't re-bench on restart, so you're good-to-go, so to speak. Also, the self-built boinc_client weighs in at only 5.6mb whereas the "stock client" unzips to something like 8.9 mb as an execuable. You can tweak boinc_client with processor specific optimizations all you want, but it won't make the client apps (hasum etc.) run any faster in the long run. FWIW - YMMV. JSC aka Xcamel <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Client performance
(Message 1517)
Posted 23 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: Switched Kahuna from HT to real dual (dual 2.8GHz xeons) was 7.15 +/- (4 models) now 3.0 even (2 models) 1GB memory JSC aka Xcamel >> Team Weather CPUnderground >> BOINCing since 2/2003 <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
13)
Message boards :
climateprediction.net Science :
Public Betatest ?
(Message 1516)
Posted 23 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: The trick is not to let 500,000 people join up on the same day and end up "JQ'd" (old beta joke) like SSL did - that was a **really big** mistake. JSC aka Xcamel >> BOINCer since 2/2/03 <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Running multiple projects.
(Message 1515)
Posted 23 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: Running 4.03.latest here/now - no problems encountered - execpt for the never ending boffed benchmark story. <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINC Platform Statistics (including CPDN stats)
(Message 1476)
Posted 22 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: Very nice indeed! JSC aka Xcamel & Team Weather CPUnderground <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Heavy Hard Drive Fragmentation Caused By CPDN
(Message 1420)
Posted 21 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: And if you plan on running multiple models with SMP, be perpared to give up about 5 GIG of disk space.. <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPDN Stats Graphic Service
(Message 1395)
Posted 21 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: or not... <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png"> |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPDN Stats Graphic Service
(Message 1394)
Posted 21 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: I hate testing these things... http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php/userID:55/trans:off/.png |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
WEB Page, new features with error messages
(Message 1388)
Posted 21 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: I think it looks great with the "latest trickle" info at the bottom - whomever - great job! |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
bad linux performance
(Message 1349)
Posted 20 Aug 2004 by old_user175 Post: all my linux boxes have between 512mb and 2gb of regular memory - FC2 installs without a swap file by default.. it's the processor performance I'm complaining about - swap memory does nothing for that. only some optimization of the client to utilize smp/HT will help |
©2024 climateprediction.net