climateprediction.net home page
New Win98 or Win ME or Win NT4 Users Please Post Here!
New Win98 or Win ME or Win NT4 Users Please Post Here!
log in

Advanced search

Questions and Answers : Windows : New Win98 or Win ME or Win NT4 Users Please Post Here!

Previous · 1 · 2
Author Message
Profile Morgan the Gold
Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 04
Posts: 14
Credit: 1,054,728
RAC: 10
Message 6504 - Posted: 2 Dec 2004, 0:31:03 UTC
Last modified: 2 Dec 2004, 0:40:31 UTC

No, (A.M.D. Athlon 2100+ win98)
No, (A.M.D. Athlon 64 3000+ win98)
No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)
Yes ,no SETI or LHC on this machine only.(A.M.D. Sempron 3300+ win98)

<img src="http://www.setisynergy.com/images/stats/3638cpdn.png">
____________

Profile Andrew Hingston
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 04
Posts: 753
Credit: 9,804,700
RAC: 0
Message 6507 - Posted: 2 Dec 2004, 7:59:59 UTC - in response to Message 6504.

&gt; No, (A.M.D. Athlon 2100+ win98)
&gt; No, (A.M.D. Athlon 64 3000+ win98)

The Win 98/AMD combination was said to be pretty flakey in the classic version as well.

&gt; No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)

A few people have managed to complete a run with processors well below the 800 MHz recommended minimum spec. But they are very much the exception.

&gt; Yes ,no SETI or LHC on this machine only.(A.M.D. Sempron 3300+ win98)

At least the Win 98/AMD combination isn't fatal for CPDN!
____________

Profile geophi
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 1812
Credit: 36,354,717
RAC: 10,605
Message 6509 - Posted: 2 Dec 2004, 12:55:03 UTC - in response to Message 6507.

&gt; &gt; No, (Intel Celeron D 320 win98)
&gt;
&gt; A few people have managed to complete a run with processors well below the 800
&gt; MHz recommended minimum spec. But they are very much the exception.
&gt;
&gt;
Hi Andrew. I think that the 320 runs at 2.4 GHz. It's the new Intel model numbering scheme.

Profile old_user156
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 186
Credit: 1,612,182
RAC: 0
Message 6510 - Posted: 2 Dec 2004, 13:59:55 UTC
Last modified: 2 Dec 2004, 14:04:43 UTC

AMD XP 2500+ spec' 11x167 for 1.83GHz running at 12.5x180 for 2.25GHz watercooled, <a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/show_host_detail.php?hostid=65740">'Marion'</a>, is running CP-boinc under WinME - she has completed two models and is 10% through her 3rd model running CP-boinc. BOINC v4.13 plus CP v4.04 works for her... :-)

____________
<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/"><img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/cpdn/stats.php?userID=6&amp;team=off&amp;trans=off"></a>

<a href="http://www.nmvs.dsl.pipex.com/">Distributed Mania</a>

Profile Andrew Hingston
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 04
Posts: 753
Credit: 9,804,700
RAC: 0
Message 6511 - Posted: 2 Dec 2004, 14:11:24 UTC - in response to Message 6509.

&gt; Hi Andrew. I think that the 320 runs at 2.4 GHz. It's the new Intel model
&gt; numbering scheme.

Thanks. Should have checked. Intel periodically invite me to visit their website but I'm afraid I'm usually seduced by the latest top of the range models which I can't afford and can't justify getting.
____________

Previous · 1 · 2

Questions and Answers : Windows : New Win98 or Win ME or Win NT4 Users Please Post Here!


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2019 climateprediction.net